February 07, 2026
11 11 11 AM
ZAMFARA ASSEMBLY DISSOLVES COMMITTEES, ADOPTS CAPACITY BUILDING MEASURES
ABIA POLICE DENY BOMBS FOUND IN ABA CHURCH
PLATEAU DIASPORA CALLS ON GOVERNOR MUTFWANG TO ENSURE POLICY CONSISTENCY
NECO RELEASES 2025 EXTERNAL SSCE RESULTS
PDP SETS MARCH 28/29 FOR NATIONAL CONVENTION IN ABUJA
FCTA WORKERS SUSPEND INDUSTRIAL ACTION
NIGERIA, SAUDI ARABIA DEEPEN HAJJ AND UMRAH TIES AT HISTORIC ABUJA MEETING
ANAMBRA ASSEMBLY SEEKS STATEWIDE STAFF AUDIT
NAPTIP BUSTS TRAFFICKING RING, RESCUES VICTIMS IN ANAMBRA
SOLUDO REASSURES ANAMBRA RESIDENTS ON END TO SIT-AT-HOME

SUPREME COURT DELIVERS JUDGMENT ON THE KANO STATE GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION DISPUTE TOMORROW         

Share

 

SUPREME COURT DELIVERS JUDGMENT ON THE KANO STATE GOVERNORSHIP ELECTION DISPUTE TOMORROW                                                                      11-01-23

By Sadiq Aminu                                                       The Supreme Court will tomorrow, deliver judgment on the Kano State governorship election dispute between Governor Abba Yusuf of the New Nigeria Peoples Party and the All Progressives Congress candidate, Dr. Nasiru Gawuna.

This is contained in a notice issued by the apex court to all the parties in the suit.

Also, the apex court will deliver judgment in six other governorship disputes before it.

According to the notice, the court directed that each party should not have more than two lawyers in attendance.

A five-member panel of the Supreme Court led by Justice John Inyang Okoro had in December, last year, listened to the final arguments by the parties concerned and reserved judgment on the Kano case.

The Kano State Governorship Tribunal had sacked Governor Kabir Yusuf and ordered the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, to withdraw his certificate of return and instead issue same to Nasir Yusuf Gawuna, the candidate of the All Progressives Congress, APC, in the March 18, 2023 governorship election.

However, not satisfied with the Tribunal judgement, Governor Yusuf had approached the Court of Appeal but the appellate court had while affirming his sack, further held that the governor was not a member of the party as of the time of the election and could not have been said to have been properly sponsored for the election.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Home
Our Channel
About Us
Contact Us
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x