June 09, 2026
11 11 11 AM
FCT TEACHERS PROTEST PROLONGED CAPTIVITY OF ABDUCTED COLLEAGUES, STUDENTS
KANO STEPS UP FLOOD PREVENTION AHEAD OF RAINY SEASON
KANO CUTS MATERNAL DEATHS BY 45% IN THREE YEARS
REPS DEMAND SPECIAL SECURITY FORCE FOR SCHOOLS
TINUBU RETURNS TO ABUJA AFTER EID-EL-KABIR HOLIDAY
ONDO SHUTS SCHOOLS OVER BANDITRY FEARS
AKPABIO CALLS FOR UNITY IN RESCUE OF ABDUCTED OYO PUPILS, TEACHERS
NAIRA TRADES AT ₦1,373/$ IN OFFICIAL MARKET
LAGARDE URGES EUROZONE TO STRENGTHEN EURO’S GLOBAL INFLUENCE
ARMY RESCUES 23 ABDUCTED PASSENGERS AFTER KOGI HIGHWAY ATTACK

JUSTICE RAHMAN OSHODI OF LAGOS SPECIAL OFFENCES COURT DISMISSES AN APPLICATION FILLED BY GOODWIN EMEFIELE                                                                                                     

Share

JUSTICE RAHMAN OSHODI OF LAGOS SPECIAL OFFENCES COURT DISMISSES AN APPLICATION FILLED BY GOODWIN EMEFIELE                                                                                                                                       08-01-25

               By Sadiq Aminu                                                                Justice Rahman Oshodi of the Lagos Special Offences Court has dismissed an application filed by Godwin Emefiele, the former Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), which challenged the court’s jurisdiction over his case.

Justice Oshodi stated that the prosecution has established territorial jurisdiction concerning counts eight to twenty-six, based on various facts presented in the evidence attached to the case file.

Emefiele is facing a total of 26 counts brought by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), which accuse him of misusing his office, resulting in a loss of $4.5 billion and 2.8 billion naira.

His co-defendant, Henry Omoile, is also on trial for related charges, including the unlawful acceptance of gifts.

In his ruling, Justice Oshodi noted that while counts one to four relate to the general offence of abuse of office as defined by criminal law, the specific conduct alleged in those counts specifically, the allocation of foreign exchange without a bid is not defined as an offence in any written law. Consequently, the court struck out these charges.

Regarding counts eight to twenty-six, the judge emphasized that by applying established legal principles, the evidence presented was sufficient to affirm the court’s territorial jurisdiction.

He clarified that this finding is limited solely to the jurisdictional objection and does not address the merits of the allegations against Emefiele.

Justice Rahman Oshodi subsequently ruled that the objection challenging the court’s territorial jurisdiction over counts eight to twenty-six fails and is thereby dismissed, noting that the prosecution has established a sufficient territorial nexus to compel Emefiele to answer the charges.

The matter was later adjourned until February 24 and 26 for the continuation of the trial.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Home
Magazines
Our Channel
About Us
Contact Us
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x