April 08, 2026
11 11 11 AM
BAUCHI PDP SETS UP EXIT COMMITTEE AMID DEFECTION TALKS
POLICE NAB SUSPECTED ROBBER, RECOVER GUNS IN IMO
CLASHES KILL 11, DESTROY HOMES IN NASARAWA
COURT ADJOURNS EL-RUFAI BAIL HEARING, BARS JOURNALISTS
SENATE ORDERS PROBE INTO PLATEAU KILLINGS
TINUBU SEEKS ₦9TRN INCREASE TO 2026 BUDGET
TINUBU CONDEMNS KILLINGS, ORDERS SECURITY CRACKDOWN
UK, US, FRANCE APPROVE NIGERIA’S AMBASSADORS
NORTHERN GOVS BACK TINUBU, PUSH SECURITY REFORMS
NCC ORDERS TELCOS TO COMPENSATE USERS FOR POOR NETWORK

N12.3 BILLION FRAUD CASE: OTUDEKO, OTHERS PROTEST LACK OF SERVICE

Share

N12.3 BILLION FRAUD CASE: OTUDEKO, OTHERS PROTEST LACK OF SERVICE                                                                                        21-01-25

By Sadiq Aminu                                                              The courtroom witnessed high drama as legal counsel for the defendants in an N12.3 billion fraud case involving the Chairman of the Honeywell Group, Oba Otudeko, and others, raised objections over procedural lapses.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has brought a 13-count charge against Otudeko, a former Managing Director of First Bank Plc, Olabisi Onasanya, former Honeywell board member Soji Akintayo, and Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

The allegations involve obtaining N12.3 billion under false pretenses between 2013 and 2014.

Marked as FHC/L/20C/2025, the case took an unusual turn when the defence counsel, led by Mr Bode Olanipekun (SAN), announced their appearance “in protest,” citing non-service of the charge on the defendants.

When the case was called, Olanipekun argued that media reports, rather than formal communication, informed his client of the charges.

Displaying headlines from January 17, he criticized the EFCC’s reliance on public speculation rather than following due process.

Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke questioned why the defence counsel was in court if no formal service had been effected.

In response, Mr Olumide Fusika (SAN), representing the second defendant, acknowledged he had printed a copy of the charge himself.

The prosecutor, Mr. Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN), admitted challenges in serving the defendants but assured the court of ongoing efforts.

He moved for substituted service at the defendants’ last known addresses, which the court approved.

Taking a cooperative stance, Fusika volunteered to accept service on behalf of his client, prompting the court to direct the prosecutor to issue him a copy in open court.

Justice Aneke adjourned the matter to February 13 for arraignment.

The EFCC alleges the funds were obtained in multiple tranches, including sums of N5.2 billion, N6.2 billion, and N500 million. The case continues to highlight procedural tensions in high-profile prosecutions.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Home
Magazines
Our Channel
About Us
Contact Us
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x