March 15, 2025
11 11 11 AM
CNG CONVERSION CENTRE REACHES ADVANCED STAGE IN BENUE STATE     
TOM IKIMI LED DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS THE EXPULSION OF THE EMBATTLED NATIONAL SECRETARY OF PDP
ICPC ARRAIGNS SUSPENDED RURAL ELECTRIFICATION AGENCY’S EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ONE OTHER FOR N15M CONTRACT FRAUD 
GOVERNOR IDRIS DIRECTS FOR THE RESETTLEMENT OF VICTIMS OF LAKURAWA BANDITS ATTACK IN KEBBI 
EFCC PRESENTS THIRD WITNESS IN EX- KWARA GOVERNOR, FINANCE COMMISSIONER ALLEGED N5.78BN SUBEB FRAUD TRIAL 
MINISTER OF HEALTH AND AND SOCIAL CALLS FOR STRONGER COLLABORATION AMONG THE THREE TIERS OF GOVERNMENT       
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ORDERS IGP TO ARREST SOME FCDA OFFICIALS OVER ALLEGED BREACH of BUILDING CODE               
MATAWALLE DONATES ₦500 MILLION TO APC SUPPORTERS IN ZAMFARA FOR RAMADAN                                                                               
YUSUF SEEKS STRONGER ECONOMIC TIES BETWEEN KANO AND CHINA
KANO STATE HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY PASSES INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT AGENCY BILL

APPEAL: SUPREME COURT DISMISSES ALHAJI ATIKU ABUBAKAR’S MOTION SEEKING TO FILE FRESH EVIDENCE   

Share

APPEAL: SUPREME COURT DISMISSES ALHAJI ATIKU ABUBAKAR’S MOTION SEEKING TO FILE FRESH EVIDENCE                                                              26-10-23

By Sadiq Aminu                                                    The Supreme Court has dismissed the motion by former Vice President and candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, seeking leave of court to file fresh evidence in his appeal against the victory of President Bola Tinubu, in the February 25, presidential election.

Atiku, had in the motion, pleaded the apex court to grant him leave to bring in additional evidence by way of depositions on oath from the Chicago State University for use in his appeal, the certified discovery deposition made by Caleb Westberg on behalf of Chicago State University disclaiming the certificate presented President Bola Tinubu to the Independent National Electoral Commission.

Ruling on the motion, the 7-Man Panel of Justices led by Justice Inyang Okoro, held that the apex court had no jurisdiction to grant the filing of fresh evidence that was not pleaded at the Presidential Election Petitions Court.

Justice Okoro held that Atiku would have deemed it fit to file for an amendment of his pleadings and for extension of time, since the 180 days allowed by the Constitution had elapsed since the 17th of last month.

As at the time of filing this report, the justices were taking a decision on the merit of the main appeals brought by the appellants challenging the victory of Bola Tinubu in the February 25 presidential election.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Leave a Reply

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Home
Our Channel
About Us
Contact Us
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x