May 19, 2026
11 11 11 AM
TINUBU PLEDGES RESCUE OF ABDUCTED OYO PUPILS, TEACHERS
BANDITS KILL 10, INCLUDING PREGNANT WOMAN, IN KATSINA MARKET ATTACK
ADELEKE ORDERS REVIVAL OF SAFE SCHOOL INITIATIVE AFTER OYO SCHOOL ABDUCTIONS
DANGOTE INCREASES ETHIOPIA FERTILISER PROJECT INVESTMENT TO $4BN
LABOUR PARTY CAUTIONS ASPIRANTS AGAINST OBTAINING NOMINATION FORMS FROM ABURE
APC CLEARS YAHAYA BELLO, OTHER ASPIRANTS FOR KOGI SENATORIAL PRIMARIES
APC LAWMAKER YUSUF GAGDI LOSES RE-ELECTION TICKET IN PLATEAU
COURT FINES PLAINTIFF ₦1M IN SUIT SEEKING TO STOP JONATHAN’S 2027 PRESIDENTIAL BID
EFCC ARRAIGNS BLESSING CEO OVER ALLEGED ₦36 MILLION FRAUD
EX-FIRS BOSS NAMI PLEDGES PEOPLE-CENTERED LEADERSHIP DURING NIGER SOUTH TOUR

APPEAL: SUPREME COURT DISMISSES ALHAJI ATIKU ABUBAKAR’S MOTION SEEKING TO FILE FRESH EVIDENCE   

Share

APPEAL: SUPREME COURT DISMISSES ALHAJI ATIKU ABUBAKAR’S MOTION SEEKING TO FILE FRESH EVIDENCE                                                              26-10-23

By Sadiq Aminu                                                    The Supreme Court has dismissed the motion by former Vice President and candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party, Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, seeking leave of court to file fresh evidence in his appeal against the victory of President Bola Tinubu, in the February 25, presidential election.

Atiku, had in the motion, pleaded the apex court to grant him leave to bring in additional evidence by way of depositions on oath from the Chicago State University for use in his appeal, the certified discovery deposition made by Caleb Westberg on behalf of Chicago State University disclaiming the certificate presented President Bola Tinubu to the Independent National Electoral Commission.

Ruling on the motion, the 7-Man Panel of Justices led by Justice Inyang Okoro, held that the apex court had no jurisdiction to grant the filing of fresh evidence that was not pleaded at the Presidential Election Petitions Court.

Justice Okoro held that Atiku would have deemed it fit to file for an amendment of his pleadings and for extension of time, since the 180 days allowed by the Constitution had elapsed since the 17th of last month.

As at the time of filing this report, the justices were taking a decision on the merit of the main appeals brought by the appellants challenging the victory of Bola Tinubu in the February 25 presidential election.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Home
Magazines
Our Channel
About Us
Contact Us
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x