April 28, 2026
11 11 11 AM
COURT SHIFTS HEARING IN SUIT TO DEREGISTER ADC, OTHERS TO MAY 5
DR CONGO LAUNCHES PARAMILITARY FORCE TO PROTECT MINING SITES
US WARNS NIGERIANS: VISA OVERSTAYS COULD COST YOU FUTURE OPPORTUNITIES
NUPENG FLAGS RISING JOB LOSSES, RIGHTS VIOLATIONS IN OIL SECTOR
ENGR. ALHAJI YUNUSA TURBANING DRAWS CROWD AS NDA FCT GETS NEW PRESIDENT
2026 NATIONWIDE DATA VERIFICATION EXERCISE
TINUBU HOLDS HIGH-LEVEL TALKS WITH SENATE LEADERS ON NATIONAL ISSUES
OFFICE OF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION
REPS PUSH FOR PRICE STABILITY POLICIES TO PROTECT FARMERS FROM HEAVY LOSSES
LAGOS REINTRODUCES MONTHLY SANITATION, WARNS DEFAULTERS

ICPC ARRAIGNS NSITF STAFF FOR FORGERY   

Share

ICPC ARRAIGNS NSITF STAFF FOR FORGERY                                                                          01-11-24

By Sadiq Aminu                                                               The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission ICPC, has arraigned one Tiemo Joy Alabogha on a 6-count charge of forgery, intent to commit fraud and making of false statement amongst other misconducts.

The defendant who is a member of staff of the Nigerian Social Insurance Trust Fund NSITF, was arraigned before Honorable Justice Ogbonaya of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Zuba.

In a Statement by ICPC, Spokesman, Mr Ademola Bakare says Alabogha, was accused of producing and presenting a forged Bachelor of Education certificate from the University of Calabar (UNICAL) to NSITF, knowingfully well that it was not genuine.
She was therefore deemed to have committed an offence contrary to and punishable under section 364 of the Penal Code, Laws of the FCT.

The accused was further arraigned for presenting a letter of certificate of confirmation, supposedly emanating from UNICAL, which confirmed that the falsified certificate of education was genuine.

This according to the charge sheet read, contravened 25(1)(a) and was punishable under Section 68 of the Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences Act 2000.

The defense counsel meanwhile, urged the Court to grant bail to the Defendant to which prosecuting counsel, Aniekan Ekong, did not oppose the application.

Ekong, however, urged that “should the Court be minded to grant bail to the defendant, it should be on such terms and conditions that will guarantee the availability of the defendant for trial.”

The trial judge ordered that the defendant be remanded at the Suleja Custodial Facility pending ruling on her bail application.

The matter was adjourned to the 19th of February, 2025 for the hearing of the substantive case.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Home
Magazines
Our Channel
About Us
Contact Us
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x